Standard 720p output-second meter
Wan 2.7 API pricing
Compare exact Wan 2.7 text-to-video routes at 720p with no audio input, excluding image, reference, edit, 1080p, and promotional top-up pricing.
Wan 2.7 API pricing
Wan 2.7 720p no-audio price per second
- Reviewed comparison scope
- Wan 2.7 · text to video · standard · 720p · no audio input · global · USD per generated video second
- Publication gate
- At least 3 unique providers with accepted, fresh, reviewed evidence
| Price rank | Provider | Route and tier | Published meter | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kie.ai | aggregator · standard | $0.08 / video secondfresh | First-party sourceChecked Aug 23, 2026Fresh until Aug 30, 2026 |
| 2Tie | fal.ai | aggregator · standard | $0.1 / video secondfresh | First-party sourceChecked Aug 23, 2026Fresh until Aug 30, 2026 |
| 2Tie | WaveSpeedAI | aggregator · standard | $0.1 / video secondfresh | First-party sourceChecked Aug 23, 2026Fresh until Aug 30, 2026 |
Price meter only: Kie.ai is normalized from 16 standard credits per second at $0.005 per credit. Top-up bonuses, 1080p, audio input, image-to-video, reference-to-video, video edit, and image routes are excluded. Equal prices share a price rank; provider name and offer ID determine only their stable display order.
Configuration-specific buying guide
How to use this Wan 2.7 API pricing result
Wan 2.7 is a suite, not one universal API meter. This ranking fixes the text-to-video route, standard service, 720p output, and no audio input. Kie.ai publishes sixteen standard credits per second and explains that one credit is approximately half a cent, yielding eight cents per second. fal and WaveSpeedAI each publish ten cents per second at 720p. The three exact routes pass the minimum sample gate.
Promotional credit bonuses are not used. Kie.ai describes lower effective rates for larger top-ups, but those depend on a purchasing tier rather than the model's standard public meter. Ranking the bonus price against ordinary prepaid prices would make the result depend on deposit size, so APIDir retains the standard sixteen-credit calculation.
Wan 2.7 also exposes image-to-video, reference-to-video, video editing, image generation, different resolutions, and optional audio. Those capabilities can be useful but they are separate workloads. The displayed order says nothing about quality, queue time, support, availability, or whether one provider's implementation preserves every upstream control.
What changes the real cost
- Generated seconds and output resolution set the documented video-generation meter.
- An audio URL, first or last frame, reference media, or editing input changes the task and may change billing.
- Top-up bonuses alter effective account cost but are not a stable public base price for every buyer.
- Retries, moderation, storage, egress, transcoding, and usable-output rate belong in the production total.
Checks before production
- Pin the exact provider route and verify that text-to-video is selected rather than another Wan 2.7 mode.
- Make resolution, duration, audio absence, aspect ratio, and output count explicit at the request boundary.
- Keep submission idempotency separate from safe status polling and cap every retry path.
- Log standard credit rate, promotional adjustment if any, output seconds, request ID, and final charge separately.
Workloads this result can inform
Five-second no-audio drafts
The normalized meter yields a direct baseline for successful output. Add observed reruns and moderation failures before forecasting a campaign.
Audio-synchronized generation
Leave the no-audio scope and verify whether the provider charges or constrains audio input differently. Do not assume the same result applies.
Multi-reference storytelling
Use the reference-to-video route and inspect its media limits, identity consistency, and billing rules as a separate product decision.
Public methodology
How an offer enters the ranking
- The observation passed APIDir's accepted evidence and publication-permission gates and retains an official first-party source.
- Its offer identity, provider channel, route, and tier are explicitly included after configuration review.
- Its freshness label is fresh and its fresh-until time has not passed.
- The model, billing unit, region, and every reviewed comparison field match the group definition.
- At least three unique providers qualify; otherwise APIDir publishes no order, cheapest claim, or spread.
- Prices sort low to high. Equal prices share a rank; provider name, then offer ID, controls only stable display order.
Questions developers ask
When does APIDir publish a cheapest provider?
Only when at least three unique providers have accepted, publication-permitted, fresh observations for the same model and billing meter, with every route and material configuration field explicitly reviewed.
What happens to stale or quarantined prices?
They are excluded from ranking order. Historical evidence may remain auditable elsewhere, but it cannot support a current winner or savings claim.
Does the first row mean the provider is best overall?
No. The order covers the displayed price meter only and does not score quality, speed, uptime, limits, support, legal terms, or total production cost.
APIDir Delta · controlled rollout
Join the source-linked pricing update waitlist.
Confirm your address to join the waitlist. Editorial delivery starts only after sender, suppression, and evidence checks are active.