Evidence-gated lists
AI API pricing rankings built from comparable evidence
Price rankings require matching models and meters plus an explicit review of every material route and configuration field. Evidence coverage is reported separately and never presented as provider quality.
2 verified meter rankings
GPT-OSS 120B API pricing ranking
Compare provider-listed shared API routes on the same model, chat-completions mode, and one-million-token billing meter.
Inspect evidence →No current winnerVerification gate open
AI video API pricing ranking by exact configuration
APIDir publishes a winner only when at least three fresh provider offers pass the same reviewed model, meter, mode, resolution, duration, and audio scope.
Inspect evidence →PublishedEvidence inventory
AI API pricing evidence coverage ranking
Count fresh accepted price observations by provider without turning source coverage into a reliability, quality, or recommendation score.
Inspect evidence →Ranking contract
A missing winner is a useful result.
APIDir does not mix per-request and per-second rates, unknown and explicit audio settings, or materially different modes to create a longer list. If fewer than three unique providers pass the gate, the result stays unranked.
Published tables order the recorded price meter from low to high. Provider-specific route and tier names remain visible; the order does not assert those service features are equivalent. It does not score latency, output quality, uptime, support, limits, legal terms, or total production cost.
APIDir Delta
Get checked price changes, not noise.
One concise issue with source links, comparable configurations, and corrections.