aggregator channel · AI inference cloud
Together AI pricing and fine-tuning costs
An inference and fine-tuning platform for open and hosted AI models, with serverless and dedicated endpoint options.
Where this provider fits
An inference and fine-tuning platform for open and hosted AI models, with serverless and dedicated endpoint options.
What can change the bill
- Token rates differ by model and workload
- Dedicated endpoint economics require utilization assumptions
Who should evaluate this route
- Broad open-model catalog
- Serverless and dedicated deployment choices
- OpenAI-compatible API options
Compare two nearby options
Use the same model, meter, configuration, and workload when comparing channels.
Existing query answered
Together AI fine-tuning pricing
Current answer: Together prices fine-tuning per 1M processed training and evaluation tokens, with rates changing by model-size band and method. The public table also states a $4 minimum charge per job. These training meters are separate from inference token prices.
| Model size | SFT LoRA | SFT full | DPO LoRA | DPO full |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up to 16B | $0.48 | $0.54 | $1.20 | $1.35 |
| 17B–69B | $1.50 | $1.65 | $3.75 | $4.12 |
| 70B–100B | $2.90 | $3.20 | $7.25 | $8.00 |
The processed-token total includes training dataset tokens multiplied by epochs plus optional evaluation tokens multiplied by evaluations. Dataset preparation, method eligibility, deployment, inference, and human evaluation remain separate decisions.
Open the current fine-tuning price table · Read the fine-tuning workflow
Recorded price evidence
| Provider | Model | Configuration | Recorded price | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Together AIaggregator | GLM-5.2 | model: z-ai/glm-5.2 · chat-completions · serverless · not-applicable · no audio | $1.4 / 1M input tokensstale | Provider sourceChecked Aug 22, 2026 |
| Together AIaggregator | GLM-5.2 | model: z-ai/glm-5.2 · chat-completions · serverless · not-applicable · no audio | $4.4 / 1M output tokensstale | Provider sourceChecked Aug 22, 2026 |
| Together AIaggregator | GPT Image 2 | model: gpt-image-2 · text-to-image · serverless-default · provider-default · no audio | $0.053 / imagestale | Provider sourceChecked Aug 22, 2026 |
| Together AIaggregator | GPT-OSS 120B | model: openai/gpt-oss-120b · chat-completions · serverless · not-applicable · no audio | $0.15 / 1M input tokensstale | Provider sourceChecked Aug 27, 2026 |
| Together AIaggregator | GPT-OSS 120B | model: openai/gpt-oss-120b · chat-completions · serverless · not-applicable · no audio | $0.6 / 1M output tokensstale | Provider sourceChecked Aug 27, 2026 |
| Together AIaggregator | Kimi API | model: moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · chat-completions · serverless · not-applicable · no audio | $3 / 1M input tokensstale | Provider sourceChecked Aug 22, 2026 |
| Together AIaggregator | Kimi API | model: moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · chat-completions · serverless · not-applicable · no audio | $15 / 1M output tokensstale | Provider sourceChecked Aug 22, 2026 |
| Together AIaggregator | Qwen API | model: Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · chat-completions · serverless · not-applicable · no audio | $2.5 / 1M input tokensstale | Provider sourceChecked Aug 22, 2026 |
| Together AIaggregator | Qwen API | model: Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · chat-completions · serverless · not-applicable · no audio | $6.25 / 1M output tokensstale | Provider sourceChecked Aug 22, 2026 |
Checked evidence, not a ranking: fresh rows were checked against the linked first-party source on the shown date. APIDir does not name a cheapest provider unless exact configurations and units match. Recheck before purchasing.
Model price comparisons for this provider
Follow each model page to compare this provider route with other accepted, source-linked offers on matching billing meters.
Related provider comparisons
Use a named alternative and explicit decision dimensions instead of comparing provider brands in the abstract.
Questions developers ask
What does APIDir verify about Together AI?
APIDir separates the service channel from the underlying model owner, records exact offer configuration, links the source, and exposes the check date.
Does an entry mean APIDir recommends this provider?
No. A directory record is a research starting point. Review current sources, legal terms, limits, and a workload-specific test.
Why can a displayed observation be stale?
Historical observations remain visible for audit, but stale records do not support current cheapest or savings claims.
APIDir Delta · controlled rollout
Join the source-linked pricing update waitlist.
Confirm your address to join the waitlist. Editorial delivery starts only after sender, suppression, and evidence checks are active.