Compare AI API prices in one place

Compare AI API prices by provider, model, or workload

Start with a provider profile, match an exact model across routes, or calculate the cost of the workload you need to ship. Every number keeps its first-party source and check date.

Cost decision center

Normalize price by the output you can ship.

Calculate LLM, image, background removal, voice, dubbing, 3D, GPU, and video workloads without mixing unlike billing units.

All API cost calculators →

Model-level comparisons

Match the offer, not just the name.

Resolution, duration, audio, mode, tier, route, and region can change the effective price.

Calculate a token workload →
video

Seedance 2.0

Compare source-linked Seedance 2.0 video API offers by provider, resolution, mode, and audio configuration.

Compare offers →
video

Kling 3.0

Compare Kling 3.0 API rates only when mode, tier, resolution, duration, and audio settings match.

Compare offers →
video

Veo 3.1

Review source-linked Veo 3.1 API pricing across first-party and hosted routes without mixing configurations.

Compare offers →
video

Luma Ray 3.2

Compare Luma Ray 3.2 API routes at the same SDR, resolution, duration, mode, region, and fixed-request billing scope.

Compare offers →
video

Hailuo 2.3

Compare Hailuo 2.3 standard text-to-video routes only at the same 768p, six-second, no-audio request configuration.

Compare offers →
video

Wan 2.7

Compare exact Wan 2.7 text-to-video provider routes at 720p without audio using a source-linked per-second meter.

Compare offers →
video

Runway Gen-4.5

Compare exact Runway Gen-4.5 text-to-video prices across owner-direct and marketplace routes without declaring a two-source winner.

Compare offers →
text

GPT-OSS 120B

Compare source-linked GPT-OSS 120B input and output token prices across provider routes while keeping infrastructure compute meters separate.

Compare offers →
image

FLUX Image

Compare FLUX image API routes by exact model version, image meter, resolution, provider channel, and source-linked price.

Compare offers →
image

Recraft V3

Compare exact Recraft V3 raster text-to-image routes by provider without mixing the separately priced vector model or editing operations.

Compare offers →
image

Seedream 4.5

Compare exact Seedream 4.5 base text-to-image routes at one 2K output without mixing editing, sequential generation, or newer versions.

Compare offers →
text

GPT API

Compare GPT API routes by exact model ID, context band, input, cached-input and output meters, provider channel, and source.

Compare offers →
text

Claude API

Compare Claude API routes by exact model, context tier, input and output meter, direct or router channel, source, and effective date.

Compare offers →
multimodal

Gemini API

Compare Gemini API routes by exact model, service channel, standard or batch tier, token meter, and first-party source.

Compare offers →
image

Nano Banana API

Compare Nano Banana API providers by exact model version, image resolution, output count, route, source, and per-image price.

Compare offers →
text

Grok API

Compare Grok API pricing by exact model, direct or router channel, context tier, token meter, and source-linked route.

Compare offers →
image

GPT Image 2

Compare GPT Image 2 API providers by image size, quality, output count, route, first-party source, and per-image price.

Compare offers →
text

Qwen API

Compare Qwen API pricing by exact model ID, provider channel, input and output token meter, context, and official source.

Compare offers →
text

Kimi API

Compare Kimi API pricing across provider routes without mixing Kimi versions, token meters, context tiers, or service channels.

Compare offers →
text

GLM-5.2

Compare GLM-5.2 API token prices across provider routes with exact model identity, meter, tier, source, and check date.

Compare offers →
text

Mistral Medium 3.5

Compare Mistral Medium 3.5 owner-direct and routed API evidence without treating two access channels as independent infrastructure or declaring a winner.

Compare offers →

APIDir method

Every number keeps its source.

APIDir preserves offer identity instead of collapsing unlike configurations into a single headline. Material changes are quarantined until reviewed. Old observations remain visible as historical evidence but cannot drive a current recommendation.

Use cost calculators to normalize a workload, provider profiles to shortlist a route, and verified rankings to inspect truly comparable meters. Then open each first-party source before committing spend.

Six provider routes feeding source evidence into one verified AI API pricing ledger
AI concept diagramConcept diagram: provider routes feed one evidence ledger. The live source-linked table, not this illustration, remains the pricing source of truth.

Questions developers ask

What does APIDir verify?

Every accepted observation records a provider route, model, billing unit, configuration, source URL, evidence hash, and check date.

Does APIDir name the cheapest provider?

Only when exact comparable offers are fresh. Stale or mismatched evidence cannot support a cheapest or savings claim.

Can providers pay for a better rank?

No. Future sponsorship will be clearly labelled and will never affect editorial ordering, evidence status, or price sorting.

Are documented integrations production-stack claims?

No. They describe what public source or first-party documentation shows and state the evidence boundary on every page.

APIDir Delta · controlled rollout

Join the source-linked pricing update waitlist.

Confirm your address to join the waitlist. Editorial delivery starts only after sender, suppression, and evidence checks are active.